Homosexuality for Catholics?

by John Wijngaards

There is much research going on concerning the issue of homosexuality. We will improve on this page in the future. Keep an eye on it!

Scriptural condemnation of homosexuality?

It looks as if homosexuality has been denounced in both the Old and New Testaments.

  • The Hebrew story of Sodom and Gomorrah has had much influence on Christian beliefs (Genesis 19,1-29). The story tells of God’s destruction of this city as a punishment for homosexual practices. See also Judges 19,1-30; Leviticus 18,22; 20,13-23).
  • In Romans 1,26-27 and 1 Corinthians 6,9-11 Paul condemned the ‘homosexual’ excesses in the Graeco-Roman empire.

In tradition, homosexuality was called a ‘sin against nature’ and was often put on a line with ‘bestiality’, that is: having intercourse with an animal. For the State it was a criminal offence, usually punishable by death. Note that our renewed, informed understanding leads to a different evaluation of socalled ‘tradition’.


However, a careful study of the inspired texts shows that the scriptural authors did NOT refer to ‘homosexuality’ as we understand it today.

What is the thinking in the Church today?


The traditional view

While softening the complete condemnation it voiced in the past, the Vatican Congregation for Doctrine still opposes all homosexual acts as ‘intrinsically disordered’ because they cannot lead to procreation.

The Congregation for Doctrine’s Declaration on Certain Issues Concerning Sexual Ethics (1974) was an improvement on earlier Roman statements because it acknowledged that there are

  • ‘homosexuals who are definitively such because of some kind of innate instinct or a pathological constitution judged to be incurable’.
  • ‘In the pastoral field, these homosexuals must certainly be treated with understanding and sustained in the hope of overcoming their personal difficulties and their inability to fit into society. Their culpability will be judged with prudence.’

But the Document still condemns all sexual homosexual acts as ‘intrinsically disordered’ and’ condemned by Scripture as a serious depravity’ (Paragraph no 8).

Vatican documents

Persona Humana, Declaration on Certain Questions Concerning Sexual Ethics by the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1975)

Letter to the Bishops of the Catholic Church on the Pastoral Care of Homosexual Persons, Declaration by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1986)
Some Considerations Concerning the Response to Legislative Proposals on the Non-Discrimination of Homosexual Persons, Declaration by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (1992)
Family, Marriage and "De Facto" Unions Declaration by the Pontifical Council for the Family (2000)
Considerations Regarding Proposals to Give Legal Recognition to Unions between Homosexual Persons, Declaration by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (2003)


The modern theological view

Catholic Theologians today consider homosexuality an existing and valid variation of human sexuality. Its morality should be judged as we judge heterosexual morality.

Why this change of view?


1. The facts.

Social research has established that 3 - 6 % of the population in most countries has an innate homosexual disposition.

Three ‘causes’ of homosexuality are now generally accepted:

  • it is a genetic trait in some people;
  • it may be the result of a hormone switch before birth, since hormones assist in the differentiation between male and female traits in the foetus;
  • it may also be enhanced by the situation in which a child grows up (i.e. incest or child abuse) and the experiences he/she has of each sex.

But if God, the Creator, has made some people homosexual by nature, we cannot condemn them outright, whatever our views on legitimate sexual acts for homosexuals.

Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books



Read here more quotes from recommended Catholic books

Read also: New Directions in Sexual Ethics, Kevin Kelly

2. On-going Reflection.

Homosexuality has always existed, but only in our own time are we becoming more aware of its origins and implications. Here we will quote some modern theologians discussing the issue.

  • “ God, the one who has made all of creation, loves and cherishes all creatures without exception. And modern psychology shows us that homosexual orientation is set by age five or six. Most psychologists agree that it is not a matter of choice, whether orientation is inborn as some think or acquired very early as others say. How then could an all-loving God possibly violate Divine nature and regard homosexuals as ‘sinners’?”
    “Contemporary biblical scholars are indicating that the idea of homosexual orientation was unknown to the writers of the Sacred Scripture. Certainly these authors had no knowledge of the Kinsey research which established the existence of a continuum along which all of us are somewhere between the end points of totally heterosexual through bisexuality to exclusively homosexual. Many of the oft-quoted "condemnatory passages" may assume that heterosexuals are acting out of their violation of their ‘nature’.”
    Sister Mary Ann Ford, Pastoral Theologian
  • “When read at face value, the Scriptures have nothing positive to say about homogenital behaviour. However, most Christians do not interpret the Bible literally; they try to understand the Scriptures in their historical and cultural context and see what meaning the Scriptures have for us today. These Scriptures were written approximately 2000 or more years ago when there was no knowledge of constitutional homosexuality. The Scripture writers believed that all people were naturally heterosexual so that they viewed homosexuality activity as unnatural.”
    “Since we have come to know that homosexuality is just as natural and God-given as heterosexuality, we realize that the Biblical injunctions against homosexuality were conditioned by the attitudes and beliefs about this form of sexual expression which were held by people without benefit of centuries of scientific knowledge and understanding.”
    “It is unfair of us to expect or impose a twentieth century mentality and understanding about equality of genders, races and sexual orientations on the Biblical writers. We must be able to distinguish the eternal truths the Bible is meant to convey from the cultural forms and attitudes expressed there.”
  • “God has created people with romantic and physical attractions to the same sex, as well as those with attractions to the opposite sex. Many, if not most, people, we are now discovering, have both kinds of attractions in varying degrees. All of these feelings are natural and are considered good and blessed by God. These feelings and attractions are not sinful. Most Catholic moral theologians now hold that homogenital behaviour, as well as heterogenital behaviour, is good and holy in God's sight when it is an expression of a special and unique love which one person has for another. Both homosexual and heterosexual genital expression can be sinful if they are manipulative, dishonest, or unloving actions.”
    Sister Jeannine Gramick, PhD, College of Notre Dame Maryland.
  • “Catholicism uses four major sources for principles and guidance in ethical questions like homosexuality: scripture, tradition (theologians, church documents, official teachings, etc), reason, and human experience. All are used in conjunction with one another. Scripture is the fundamental and primary authoritative Catholic source -- but not the only source. Biblical witness is taken seriously, but not literally. An individual scriptural text must be understood in the larger context of the original language and culture, the various levels of meanings, and the texts’ applications to contemporary realities in light of the role of the community's and its official leadership role in providing authoritative interpretations. Both Jewish and Christian scriptures do speak negatively of certain form of same-gender (generally male) sexual behaviour (not same-gender love), especially when associated with idol worship, lust, violence, degradation, prostitution, etc. Whether the Scriptures condemn all and every form of same-gender sexual expression in and of itself for all times, places and individuals is the topic of serious theological and Biblical discussion and debate.”
  • I do not believe that God regards homosexuality as a ‘sin’ if homosexuality means the psychosexual identity of lesbians or gay persons, which we know from contemporary scientific studies is within the boundaries of healthy, human psychological development, and which seems to be as natural for some people as heterosexuality is for others. If homosexuality means the emotional, intimate bonding in same-gender relationships of love and friendship, I believe that since God is love, where there is authentic love, God is present.”
  • “Where God is present, there can be no sin. If homosexuality means same-gender erotic, physical expressions of union and pleasure, the possibility of personal sin exists in homosexuality -- as it does in heterosexuality -- depending on the interplay of three factors: including (1) the physical behaviour itself and its meaning for the person, (2) the personal motives and intents of the person acting, and (3) the individual and social consequences or results of the behaviour. For many people, sexual behaviour which is exploitative, coercive, manipulative, dishonest, selfish or destructive of human personhood is sinful; for all people ‘sin’ means freely acting contrary to one's deeply held moral or ethical convictions, whether these come from organized religion or a personally developed value system.”
  • “ Same-gender expressions of responsible, faithful love in a covenanted relationship between two truly homosexually oriented people not gifted with celibacy is not something envisioned by the Scriptures. Whether this form of homosexuality violates biblical or anthropological principles of sexuality and personhood -- especially in the light of current scientific knowledge and human experience about the homosexual orientation -- is a key issue facing the churches and religious groups today.”
    Father C Robert Nugent , co-editor of ‘The Vatican and Homosexuality’, holds degrees from St Charles College, St Charles Theologate, a degree in library science from Villanova University and a Masters of Sacred Theology from Yale University Divinity School.
  • The Catholic Church is beginning to rediscover what it once knew; that not all persons are heterosexual, that many people are homosexual and that this is just fine. In the past, the Church accepted homosexuality more openly and even had liturgies to celebrate same sex unions.(1) There was a recognition that different sexual orientations are clearly part of God's plan for creation-some people are heterosexual and some are homosexual-this is the way God made us and we have no right to criticize God. Wherever the human race is found we find persons of differing sexual orientations. (We find the same thing in God's animal kingdom.) Human history shows that some humans have same-sex attractions and unions and others have opposite-sex attractions and unions. The desire to bond lovingly and sexually with persons of the same sex or of the opposite sex, is a fact of life, a fact of God's creation, and we have no right to call it unholy. As the Acts of the Apostles says in the Bible, we have no right to declare unclean anything that God has made (Acts of the Apostles 10:15). To do so, in fact, is a sin.

    See entire article: Professor Daniel C. Maguire, A Catholic Defense of Same Sex Marriage. Published in The Religious Consultation on Population, Reproductive Health and Ethics, April 2006



Saints Sergius and Bacchus, martyred for the faith in 303 AD. Their hagiography seems to indicate that they were gay.


  • The biblical texts were misunderstood because they were taken to imply norms imposed for all times, exceeding the intended scope of their authors.

  • In spite of the official Church continuing to defend the traditional view, the condemnation of all homosexuality in the past has now been abandoned by the majority of theologians and pastoral leaders.

  • A new pastoral practice has begun in which homosexuals are helped to accept their own sexuality and a life style that does justice both to their Christian faith and homosexual orientation.

John Wijngaards


To understand the full impact and injustice of the condemnation of homosexuality in the past, see this video clip on how the Church treated homosexuals in the Middle Ages.

For a vision of how the Church structures could work in the future, so that this important issue can be discussed have a look at the website "Church Authority"

AMRUTHA. novel by John Wijngaards
how to escape outdated Christian sexual morality
The Christian Enjoyment of Sex Frequently Asked Questions
Fantasies Nakedness Contraceptives Guilt Homosexuality Masturbation
Is love simply sex? When is sex sinful? Periods
New Focus in Catholic Sexual Morality - academic sources Origin
of negative attitudes to sex

Wijngaards Institute for Catholic Research

This website is maintained by the John Wijngaards Catholic Research Centre.

Our emblem - based on a 14th century illustration - shows Sophia, "Wisdom", in action. She was known to have been God's designer who danced at creation (Proverbs 8,12-31). In the image she is teaching geometry to medieval scholars.

We chose this for our emblem because it shows both respect for exact science and a recognition that the Spirit of God is at the root of all human research. Please help us if you can.

Natural Law and Conscience Synod on the Family 2015